How does Spring Boot simplify the deployment process compared to traditional Spring applications?

Spring Boot simplifies deployment compared to traditional Spring by embedding the application server inside the app itself, collapsing what used to be a multi-step server-and-WAR setup into a single runnable JAR.

Key Points: • Traditional Spring apps are packaged as WAR files and require a separately installed and configured application server like Tomcat. • Spring Boot embeds Tomcat, Jetty, or Undertow directly, so the JAR is fully self-contained. • Running the app is as simple as java -jar app.jar, with no external server installation or configuration step. • This self-contained model maps naturally onto containers, since a Dockerfile just needs the JAR and a JVM base image. • Auto-configuration further reduces the amount of manual server/framework wiring needed before the app can run.

Example: Where a traditional Spring app might need a DevOps engineer to install and configure Tomcat on a server before deployment, a Spring Boot app can be deployed by simply copying the JAR and running java -jar, or by shipping a Docker image built directly from it.

Interview Tip: A concise interview answer is:

"Traditional Spring apps need a separately managed application server and WAR packaging. Spring Boot embeds the server into the JAR itself, so deployment is just java -jar, with no external server setup required. That also makes it a much more natural fit for containerized deployments."